Powerplatform.se
  • Home
  • Blog Articles
  • Privacy Policy
Select Page

Emailing Queues internally – OrgDBOrg to the rescue

Feb 5, 2017

Using queues is in D365/CRM for managing functional email addresses is the the only way to go as
far as I know, unless you want to set it up as a full user, which I don’t really see the point of.

I recently ran into an interesting issue with a customer pertaining to queues and that is when you want to be able to forward mails internally to users that are registered in D365/CRM. What happens is that with the standard setting you will get two emails. Hence, you might think that going into System settings and the email tab and unchecking the “Track emails sent between CRM users as two activities”. However, this will have the unpleasant effect of disabling internal emails to queues, or in other words, if an internal user sends an email to a queue, to a system with this setting unchecked, D365/CRM will simply ignore the mail and not pull it into the D365/CRM.

By RRZE – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

So, do we have to choose between duplicate emails for internal users and being able to send emails from internal users or not getting duplicates and no emails from internal users? Well, no, there is a very special set of settings to the rescue, OrgDBOrg, which are described here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2691237/orgdborgsettings-tool-for-microsoft-dynamics-crm

There is a setting here called: DoNotIgnoreInternalEmailToQueues which by default is set to False. So, if you uncheck the “Track email sent between to activities” and then set this to True, the system will not ignore your internal emails.

A small word of caution, OrgDBOrg settings are fringe (but still supported) settings which hence are probable not as tested as normal settings in D365. I would hence recommend that you only use OrgDBOrg setting in the case you need very specifically them.

Gustaf Westerlund
MVP, Founder and CTO at CRM-konsulterna AB
www.crmkonsulterna.se

1 Comment

  1. MRB
    MRB on September 23, 2017 at 07:38

    Hi Gustaf – Nice write up; however, I'm curious to see if you successfully tested this in CRM 2016 or D365. It appeared that the registry setting DoNotIgnoreInternalEmailToQueues was either removed or deprecated after an earlier release.

    Following the details in your blog I was still not able to track internal emails to queue, so I wanted to confirm your findings.

    Thx!!
    Matt

    Reply

Leave a Reply to MRB Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Find datasource dependencies in CI-D
  • Customer Address revisited
  • DIY Redirect landing page for CI-J
  • CI-D Measure dependency on Dataverse
  • What datacenter is my dataverse instance in?

Recent Comments

  • Find datasource dependencies in CI-D - 365 Community Online on Find datasource dependencies in CI-D
  • Customer Address revisited - 365 Community Online on Customer Address revisited
  • gustaf on Unable to delete table due to entityanalyticsconfig
  • Brigitte Maheu on Unable to delete table due to entityanalyticsconfig
  • DIY Redirect landing page for CI-J – 365 Community Online on DIY Redirect landing page for CI-J

Archives

  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • October 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • May 2006

Categories

  • Blog Articles
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org